ARTICLE | August 31, 2022 | Authored by RSM US LLP
Termination (or breakup) fees in merger and acquisition agreements are essentially intended to deter parties to a proposed acquisition from backing out of the deal. An acquisition agreement may impose a potential termination fee on the target company or on the acquirer. In many situations, however, the agreement has no provision for any termination fee. Where breakup fees apply, the fee amounts often represent a fixed percentage of the transaction value, generally between 0.5% and 5%.
Capital losses generally be used only to offset capital gains. Ordinary tax deductions are preferable since they can offset nearly any sort of income. The tax benefit resulting from payment of a sizable termination fee as a result typically is less if the fee produces a capital loss rather than an ordinary deduction.
The current IRS view is that the deal termination fee produces a capital loss to the extent it relates to the purchase or sale of a capital asset. For example, corporate stock would be a capital asset to most taxpayers, and the IRS would view a stock purchase agreement breakup fee as a capital loss.
Over time, it seems the IRS changed its approach on this issue. Some years ago, taxpayers typically would claim ordinary deductions for deal breakup fees. That approach was consistent with older IRS rulings concluding that the fees represented ordinary income to the recipient. See LTR 200823012; TAM 200438038.
In 2016, the IRS concluded in ILM 201642035 and in FAA 20163701F that the party paying a breakup fee should treat the fee as a capital loss because section 1234A applied. In 2022, the IRS is adhering to that view in ILM 202224010.
The taxpayer in ILM 202224010 paid termination fees under one agreement under which it would have made an acquisition, and another agreement under which it was on the sell-side. The IRS held that section 1234A applied to both fees and denied the taxpayer’s claimed ordinary deductions.
Section 1234A says that gain or loss is capital in character if it is attributable to termination of a right or obligation with respect to property which is (or would be) a capital asset in the hands of the taxpayer. An ordinary deduction position with respect to termination fee is stronger to the extent that the terminated deal involved an acquisition (or sale) of trade or business assets that would not be capital assets. For example, a terminated acquisition to acquire depreciable (or amortizable) property categorized under the Tax Code as section 1231 assets could result in an ordinary tax deduction for a breakup fee. See, e.g., CRI-Leslie, LLC v. Comm’r, 882 F.3d 1026 (11th Cir. 2018) (forfeited deposit on uncompleted sale of property did not give rise to capital gain under section 1234A).
The IRS is sticking to its view that ordinary tax deductions are not available for termination fees relating to the breakup of an agreement to acquire or sell capital assets. Any acquirer or seller required to pay a termination fee should not assume that it is entitled to the tax benefit or an ordinary deduction. Instead, the character of any fee deduction should be closely considered in consultation with tax advisors.
Call us at (541) 773-6633 (Oregon), (208) 373-7890 (Idaho) or fill out the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
This article was written by Nick Gruidl and originally appeared on Aug 31, 2022.
2022 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM(tm) brandmark is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.