TAX ALERT | December 22, 2022 | Authored by RSM US LLP
Year-end legislation will not contain changes to the following business tax provisions:
We will have to wait to learn if any retroactive changes take place in 2023; however, with a divided government set for 2023, it does not look promising. Taxpayers should consider how these tax law changes affect their financial statements and cash flow.
No significant business tax provisions were included in a 4,100-page, year-end omnibus package that the Senate Appropriations Committee published on Dec. 19, confirming that businesses will have to contend with several unfavorable tax changes they hoped Congress would address.
Most notably, those waiting to see if the required capitalization and amortization of research costs (section 174), which became effective in 2022, would be deferred or repealed, now must account for a host of considerations. At a minimum, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filers and C corporations will now have to present R&D as a capitalized item in their year-end income tax provisions (SEC filers should have been taking this in account in quarterly filings, but the hope of a reversal appears gone).
More broadly, companies will need to assess their overall R&D posture, including undertaking necessary documentation and estimation efforts while also planning for the cash flow impact. In addition, businesses that now have taxable income due to the capitalization of these costs may need to consider whether prior loss carryforwards are available or might be subject to equity change limitations under section 382.
Also not included in the omnibus is a reset to the EBITDA calculation of section 163(j)’s business interest expense limitations, which beginning in 2022 requires a more restrictive EBIT computation for purposes of the calculation. With borrowing costs increasing as the Federal Reserve tries to tame inflation, the loss of the depreciation and amortization addback will be costly to many businesses, especially those in capital-intensive sectors such as manufacturing. Impacted companies are looking at strategies to minimize the amount of capitalized interest and we will continue our discussions with Congress on the importance of immediate expensing of R&D and the harmful effects of the changes in the calculation of section 163(j).
Lastly, business taxpayers will need to factor into their 2023 tax planning the reversal of the phasedown of bonus depreciation, which also failed to make the cut. Starting with assets placed in service as of Jan. 1, 2023, the bonus depreciation amount phases down to 80%.
The omnibus package is not completely void of tax changes. It includes, for example, the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022, as well as limitations on the deduction amount of a conservation easement for pass-through entities.
SECURE 2.0 Act
The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 is the most comprehensive retirement security legislation in decades. Its voluminous provisions significantly change the rules on qualified retirement plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs) over the next several years.
A few of the act’s headline provisions include:
SECURE 2.0 will likely cause many employers to establish new plans and/or to re-evaluate their current retirement plan designs.
Charitable conservation easements
Included in the omnibus package is a provision that limits the deduction for qualified conservation contributions made by certain pass-through entities. Under the provision, a contribution made by a partnership (whether directly or as a distributive share of a contribution of another partnership) is automatically disallowed if the amount of such contribution exceeds 2.5 times the sum of each partner’s relevant basis in the partnership. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Treasury Secretary, the limitation rules apply to S corporations and other pass-through entities in the same manner as they apply to partnerships.
There is an exception for contributions made outside of a three-year holding period (as determined under the new provision). In addition, the limitation does not apply with respect to any contribution made by any partnership if substantially all of the partnership interests in the partnership are held (directly or indirectly) by an individual and members of the individual’s family. Lastly, the limitation does not apply to contributions made to preserve certified historic structures.
The provision amends the tax code’s accuracy-related penalty provisions so as to include any disallowance by virtue of this new provision. Further, deductions that are disallowed under the provision will be treated as a listed transaction, and new reporting requirements are added. Lastly, donors are given the opportunity to correct certain deed errors within a limited period of time.
The effective date of the provision is for contributions made after the date of enactment of the omnibus bill. Any taxpayers that may be impacted should contact a member of our tax team.
In the end, while many lawmakers had expressed support and cautious optimism for inclusion of business tax provisions in the year-end omnibus, negotiating challenges among the parties as to key priorities ultimately proved too much to overcome.
As we head into a new Congress and divided government, the fate of these provisions is uncertain. Section 174 remains a priority among many in Congress, and it may have just enough bipartisan support to be included in legislation during the 118th Congress. However, many of the challenges around this and other proposed tax provisions will carry over to the new Congress. On the other hand, it may be that no significant tax legislation is enacted until 2025 when some of the TCJA provisions approach their sunsets at the end of that year.
For more insights on what businesses should do now that Congress has not addressed these key business tax provisions, watch our tax policy team’s latest episode of Tax Policy Now.
Call us at (541) 773-6633 (Oregon), (208) 373-7890 (Idaho) or fill out the form below and we’ll contact you to discuss your specific situation.
This article was written by Matt Talcoff, Ryan Corcoran, Fred Gordon, Joni Andrioff and originally appeared on 2022-12-22.
2022 RSM US LLP. All rights reserved.
The information contained herein is general in nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. RSM US LLP guarantees neither the accuracy nor completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for results obtained by others as a result of reliance upon such information. RSM US LLP assumes no obligation to inform the reader of any changes in tax laws or other factors that could affect information contained herein. This publication does not, and is not intended to, provide legal, tax or accounting advice, and readers should consult their tax advisors concerning the application of tax laws to their particular situations. This analysis is not tax advice and is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer.
RSM US Alliance provides its members with access to resources of RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance member firms are separate and independent businesses and legal entities that are responsible for their own acts and omissions, and each are separate and independent from RSM US LLP. RSM US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Members of RSM US Alliance have access to RSM International resources through RSM US LLP but are not member firms of RSM International. Visit rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International. The RSM(tm) brandmark is used under license by RSM US LLP. RSM US Alliance products and services are proprietary to RSM US LLP.